Search
Clinician Ordering Portal
Scientific evidence
The tissue systems pathology test objectively risk-stratifies patients with Barrett’s esophagus results from a multicenter US clinical experience study
Jul 2024
This study highlights the clinical experience of TissueCypher testing ordered by 891 physicians in over 8,000 patients. This real-world clinical use of TissueCypher reflects the U.S. BE surveillance population with a significant proportion (93.9%) of diagnosed cases having NDBE and 94.3% of orders originating from community-based practices
Publication: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
A clinical impact study of dermatologists’ use of diagnostic gene expression profile testing to guide patient management
Jun 2024
Determine clinical impact of GEP results on the increase/decrease of surgical excision margins and follow-up frequency.
Publication: Melanoma Management
Diagnostic discordance among histopathological reviewers of melanocytic lesions
May 2024
The management of patient with melanocytic lesions is dependent on the diagnosis with guidelines defining treatment protocols for benign nevi and malignant melanomas. Even though diagnostic discordance and diagnostic ambiguity have been previously established, the real-world impact on patient management is not well understood.Using an exhaustive review process by multiple dermatopathologists and a simulated patient treatment model, this study reveals that diagnostic discordance and ambiguity may be more common that previously reported and identifies significant variation in patient treatment in these lesions.
Publication: Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
Addition of the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test improves prognostic accuracy and risk stratification for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HR-cSCC) of the head and neck treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS)
May 2024
Assess the ability of the 40-GEP test to significantly improve metastatic risk prediction of NCCN, AJCC8, and BWH staging systems when included.
Publication: Poster, presented at the American College of Mohs Surgery 2024
A clinical impact study of dermatologists' use of diagnostic gene expression profile testing to guide patient management
Apr 2024
Diagnostic GEP tests help guide clinical decision-making in a variety of diagnostically ambiguous or clinicopathologically discordant scenarios.
Publication: Future Medicine
Pharmacogenomic characteristics and IDgenetix-guided medication management for older adults with depression and anxiety
Mar 2024
Utility of 31-gene expression profile test in identifying patients with T1 cutaneous melanoma at high risk of SLN positivity and recurrence
Mar 2024
Demonstrate that the 31-GEP offers significant prognostic value in addition to SLN status to help identify patients at the highest risk of tumor recurrence.
Publication: ePoster at SSO 2024
Prospective validation of the i31-GEP for cutaneous melanoma to select patients who may consider foregoing SLNB
Mar 2024
This study shares three-year outcomes data from Castle’s prospective, multicenter study of patients with melanoma who were being considered for an SLNB (n=322). In the study, at three years, all patients with a low-risk DecisionDx-Melanoma test result were recurrence free (recurrence free survival of 100%). The performance data shared in this presentation, in conjunction with previous validation and performance studies, show DecisionDx-Melanoma as an accurate and precise clinical tool that can identify patients who may safely forego SLNB, reducing the number of unnecessary SLNBs performed (by ~25% in this study alone) and the associated costs and risks of complications that accompany them.
Publication: Oral Presentation at SSO 2024
23-gene expression profile (GEP) testing for diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions in a Medicare-eligible population
Mar 2024
The high accuracy and clinical utility of the 23-GEP test demonstrated across multiple prior studies are applicable to the Medicare-eligible population.
Publication: Poster, presented at the 2023 College of American Pathologist (CAP) Annual Meeting
Inconsistent associations between risk factor profiles and adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) treatment in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and utility of the 40-gene expression profile to refine ART guidance
Mar 2024
ART guidance is not determined by the presence of specific clinicopathologic factors, with treated and untreated patients sharing the same risk factor profiles. cSCC risk determination based on NCCN recommendations for clinical factor assessment results in inconsistent use of ART. Including tumor biology-based prognostic information from the 40-GEP refines risk and identifies patients who are most appropriate and likely to benefit from ART, and those that can consider deferring ART
Publication: Dermatology and Therapy
Integrating the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test improves metastatic risk-stratification within clinically relevant subgroups of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients
Mar 2024
The 40-GEP test demonstrates accurate, independent, clinically actionable stratification of metastatic risk and improves predictive accuracy when integrated into risk classification systems. The improved accuracy of risk assessment when including tumor biology via the 40-GEP test ensures more risk-aligned, personalized patient management decisions.
Publication: Dermatology and Therapy
Integrating 40-GEP testing to improve clinical recommendations for adjuvant radiation for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: multidisciplinary consensus guidelines
Feb 2024
Combining clinicopathologic staging with the 40-GEP test allows for more accurate prognostic staging of cSCC tumors; this, in turn, improves precision in multidisciplinary treatment recommendations, including the use of ART. The utility of 40-GEP testing has been demonstrated in low-, higher-, and highest-stage cSCC tumors. Additionally, 40-GEP testing has shown greater specificity than current clinicopathologic guidelines in identifying patients at highest risk of nodal or distant metastasis who would most likely benefit from ART, as well as lower risk patients who would benefit less from such therapy. Appropriate use of 40-GEP testing involves a shared decision-making model between the multidisciplinary team and the patient with cSCC, taking into consideration many factors, such as the patient’s risk of metastasis, tumor and nontumor characteristics, and individual preferences.
Publication: Journal of Clinical Aesthetic Dermatology